Genome sequencing has revolutionized genetics. It also requires new mathematical tools to help life scientists make sense of enormous amounts of data. Applying new math, Kristina Crona, an American University assistant professor who researches in the area of mathematical biology, and her colleagues show how ranking pathogen mutants can help scientists understand how mutants evolve to resist drug treatments. This line of research could have implications for the treatment of diseases that can resist drug treatments, such as HIV and malaria.
In a new paper, published in the journal eLife, the researchers show that rank order is one way to identify complex genetic interactions. Conventional methods for identifying complex gene interactions rely on precise measurements of the genetic fitness of mutants. However, fitness measures are not easily applied, and they are not always reliable. By contrast, the rank order method works, even if the data is incomplete.
Prior to the publication in eLife, Crona presented the results at an academic conference. None of the biologists in the audience had heard of the mathematical tool she uses for analyzing rank orders. By the end of her talk, everyone understood how to use the tool for identifying complex gene interactions. The new shortcut was received with enthusiasm. And the math is easy.
“It’s kindergarten math,” Crona explained.
Crona uses “Dyck words,” a formula named after the 19th-century German mathematician Walther Franz Anton von Dyck, to match up the genotype with letters. Letters “x” and “y” are assigned to the pathogen mutants. Single and triple mutants correspond to “x,” and unmutated, double and four-tuple mutants correspond to “y.” The odd number of mutations produce “x” and even numbers produce “y.” The mutants in the order are ranked from high to low fitness.
“From left to right, we count x’s and y’s. If there are always more x’s, or the same numbers of mutants are x’s, then what you get is a Dyck word. This means one can see that one is dealing with a complex gene interaction,” Crona said.
Complex genetic interactions involve three or more mutations in a pathogen. It is in complex genetic interactions when pathogens have higher fitness and evolve dangerously, such as a pathogen that’s strong enough to resist antibiotics. The researchers identified complex gene interaction involving three or more mutations for HIV; a malaria-causing parasite; the type of fungus that causes black mold on fruits and vegetables; and a family of genetic mutations that contribute to antibiotic resistance.
Crona began thinking about rank orders while working with biologist Miriam Barlow on the problem of antibiotic cycling, by which hospital doctors rotate different antibiotics to thwart patient infections. Trying to help doctors maximize antibiotics’ effectiveness, the team created software called “Time Machine” that uses probabilities and rewinds the evolution of bacteria to verify treatment options for 15 antibiotics used to fight common infections. Crona noticed that rank orders were surprisingly robust. The numbers came out a bit differently in every experiment, but the most dangerous mutants were always dangerous, and harmless always harmless.
Could rank order help doctors? Crona thinks so. In medicine in the future, doctors may be able to take advantage of complex gene interactions when they develop treatment plans. Rank order can help with cutting off the chain of events in the evolution of a dangerous pathogen. Preventing lesser, intermediate mutants could stop a pathogen’s evolution, Crona said.
Materials provided by American University
- Kristina Crona, Alex Gavryushkin, Devin Greene, Niko Beerenwinkel. Inferring genetic interactions from comparative fitness data. eLife, 2017; 6 DOI: 10.7554/eLife.28629
The cambodian cure for resistant scabies mites
A member shares his story in how he was cured from resistant scabies mites in Cambodia. Where ivermectin and permethrin failed a local monk in a small town in Cambodia combated it with natural herbs and ancient remedies
Facebook group: Human Parasites Support Network
New Lyme disease tests could offer quicker, more accurate detection
New tests to detect early Lyme disease — which is increasing beyond the summer months -could replace existing tests that often do not clearly identify the infection before health problems occur.
In an analysis published on December 7 in Clinical Infectious Diseases, scientists from Rutgers University, Harvard University, Yale University, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the NIH and other academic centers, industry and public health agencies say new diagnostic methods offer a better chance for more accurate detection of the infection from the Lyme bacteria.
“New tests are at hand that offer more accurate, less ambiguous test results that can yield actionable results in a timely fashion,” said Steven Schutzer, a physician-scientist at Rutgers New Jersey Medical School and senior author. “Improved tests will allow for earlier diagnosis which should improve patient outcomes.”
Lyme disease is the most common tick-borne infection in North America and Europe. There are currently over 300,000 cases of Lyme disease annually in the United States alone and the disease is increasing and spreading into new regions. Lyme disease frequently, but not always, presents with a bull’s-eye rash. When the rash is absent, a laboratory test is needed.
The only FDA approved Lyme disease tests, based on technology developed more than two decades ago, rely on detecting antibodies that the body’s immune system makes in response to the disease. These antibody-based tests are the most commonly used tests for Lyme disease and are the current standard.
One problem, however, is that many people produce similar — called “cross-reactive” — antibodies in response to other bacteria not associated with Lyme disease, which causes confusing results and makes test accuracy more difficult.
“New tests are more exact and are not as susceptible to the same false-positive or false-negative results associated with current tests,” said Schutzer.
Schutzer and his colleagues say more accurate testing would help doctors decide when to prescribe the antibiotics used to clear the infection and help avoid severe long-term health problems. Antibody tests, can take three weeks or more for the antibody levels to reach a point where the tests can pick up a positive result.
Those involved in the paper joined forces after meeting at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory’s Banbury Center, a nonprofit research institution in New York. The meeting organized and chaired by Schutzer and John A. Branda, assistant professor of pathology at Harvard Medical School, focused on current Lyme disease tests and new scientific advances made in increasing the accuracy of the diagnosis.
“This meeting and paper resulting from it are particularly significant,” said Jan Witkowski, professor in the Watson School of Biological Sciences at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory who along with Nobel Laureate James Watson asked Schutzer to lead several symposia. “The participants noted that there are greatly improved diagnostic tests for Lyme disease that can be implemented now, and that the way is open to the development of further tests.”
- John A Branda, Barbara A Body, Jeff Boyle, Bernard M Branson, Raymond J Dattwyler, Erol Fikrig, Noel J Gerald, Maria Gomes-Solecki, Martin Kintrup, Michel Ledizet, Andrew E Levin, Michael Lewinski, Lance A Liotta, Adriana Marques, Paul S Mead, Emmanuel F Mongodin, Segaran Pillai, Prasad Rao, William H Robinson, Kristian M Roth, Martin E Schriefer, Thomas Slezak, Jessica Snyder, Allen C Steere, Jan Witkowski, Susan J Wong, Steven E Schutzer. Advances in Serodiagnostic Testing for Lyme Disease Are at Hand. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2017; DOI: 10.1093/cid/cix943
Possible new way to treat parasitic infections discovered
A chemical that suppresses the lethal form of a parasitic infection caused by roundworms that affects up to 100 million people and usually causes only mild symptoms has now been identified by researchers.
UT Southwestern Medical Center researchers have identified a chemical that suppresses the lethal form of a parasitic infection caused by roundworms that affects up to 100 million people and usually causes only mild symptoms.
“The approach we used could be applied generally to any nematode parasite, not just this one type,” said Dr. David Mangelsdorf, Chair of Pharmacology, an Investigator in the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI), and one of three corresponding authors of the study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The study’s other corresponding authors are at two universities in Philadelphia.
“The plan is to develop better compounds that mimic the Δ7-dafachronic acid used in this study and eventually to treat the host to stop parasitic infection,” he added.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports that the soil-dwelling Strongyloides stercoralis nematode, or roundworm, is the primary strongyloides species that infects humans. Experts estimate that between 30 million and 100 million people are infected worldwide, and most of them are unaware of it because their symptoms are so mild. The parasite can persist for decades in the body because of the nematode’s unique ability to reinfect the host, repeatedly going through the early stages of its life cycle. The nematode that causes the original infection exists in dirt on all continents except Antarctica, and it is most common in warmer regions, particularly remote rural areas in the tropics and subtropics where walking barefoot combined with poor sanitation leads to infection.
However, in people with compromised immune systems — such as those using long-term steroids for asthma, joint pain, or after an organ transplant — the mild form of the illness can progress to the potentially lethal form, a situation called hyperinfection. Studies indicate that mortality from untreated hyperinfection can be as high as 87 percent.
The World Health Organization reports that although the parasitic illness has almost disappeared in countries where sanitation has improved, children remain especially vulnerable in endemic regions due to their elevated contact with dirt. Further, the drug of choice, ivermectin, is unavailable in some affected countries.
“Ivermectin is used to treat the disease but is less effective in the lethal form of the infection,” said Dr. Mangelsdorf, a Professor of Pharmacology and Biochemistry. “We do not know exactly how the glucocorticoid [steroid] causes hyperinfection, but once it does, ivermectin is much less effective, prompting the search for new drugs. The new drug we used in our mouse model appears to be very effective,” he said.
To study the still unknown pathogenesis of the disease, the researchers developed a mouse model susceptible to the full range of infection by the human parasite. Because mice with intact immune systems are resistant to S. stercoralis infection, the researchers began with an immunocompromised strain of mice, and then exposed some to a synthetic steroid called methylprednisolone (MPA) that is commonly used to treat asthma in humans.
The mice were then exposed to the parasitic worms. Compared with untreated mice, those that received the steroid showed a tenfold increase in the number of parasitic female worms and a 50 percent increase in mortality, said Dr. Mangelsdorf, who holds both the Alfred G. Gilman Distinguished Chair in Pharmacology and the Raymond and Ellen Willie Distinguished Chair in Molecular Neuropharmacology in Honor of Harold B. Crasilneck, Ph.D.
In addition, third-stage larvae — the life cycle stage in which the worms can initiate hyperinfection — were found in higher numbers in the steroid-treated versus untreated mice, he added.
“Strikingly, treatment with a steroid hormone called Δ7-dafachronic acid, a chemical that binds to a parasite nuclear receptor called Ss-DAF-12, significantly reduced the worm burden in MPA-treated mice,” Dr. Mangelsdorf said. The Ss-DAF-12 receptor corresponds to a similar receptor in the long-studied C. elegans worm.
Dr. Mangelsdorf and colleagues previously showed (PNAS, 2009) that the DAF-12 receptor pathway is found in many parasitic species. They also showed that activating the receptor with Δ7-dafachronic acid could override the parasite’s development and prevent S. stercoralis from becoming infectious.
“Overall, this latest study provides a useful mouse model for S. stercoralis autoinfection and opens the possibility of new chemotherapy for hyperinfection by targeting the parasite’s own steroid hormone mechanism,” Dr. Mangelsdorf said.
- John B. Patton, Sandra Bonne-Année, Jessica Deckman, Jessica A. Hess, April Torigian, Thomas J. Nolan, Zhu Wang, Steven A. Kliewer, Amy C. Durham, James J. Lee, Mark L. Eberhard, David J. Mangelsdorf, James B. Lok, David Abraham. Methylprednisolone acetate induces, and Δ7-dafachronic acid suppresses,Strongyloides stercoralishyperinfection in NSG mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2018; 201712235 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1712235114
Health2 weeks ago
A Bleary Unicorn: The Elusive Hangover Cure
Health2 weeks ago
What I Learned Studying Real Vampires
Health2 weeks ago
Trendy Keto Diet Could Help With Some Cancer Treatments
Health2 weeks ago
In Russia's Space Graveyard, Locals Scavenge Fallen Spacecraft for Profit
Health2 weeks ago
Dirt Could Help Fight Superbugs
Health1 week ago
Cold Fathers Have Leaner Children, Study Suggests
Health2 weeks ago
Have You Accepted Your Research Mission Yet?
Health2 weeks ago
Blood At A Crime Scene Can Reveal Age of Suspect or Victim