Connect with us

Health

Are Airplanes Really a Microbial Playground?

(credit: Matej Kastelic/Shutterstock)

Crying babies, chronic snorers — they’re the usual targets of our displeasure when we fly. But, the real villains of the sky might be germs.

Flyers are packed into a cramped metal tube for hours on end where movement is limited. It seems like a microbe’s playground. But research on the topic is a bit inconclusive, despite worrying cases involving SARS and an aggressive type of influenza. Studies suggest that caution is warranted, but researchers have so far had trouble saying exactly how air travel affects disease transmission. At the moment, public health guidelines state that anyone within two rows of an infected individual could be at risk, although other studies suggest otherwise.

Fly the Germy Skies?

Most recently, a team of researchers from Emory University and the Georgia Institute of Technology—funded by Boeing—conducted their own boots-on-the-plane study of infectious disease transmission aboard commercial aircraft. On 10 flights from Atlanta to the West Coast and back, they took swabbed samples of various surfaces and recorded how often passengers and crew members moved around. Pairing the data with models of air movement and microbe dispersion gave them an idea of just how far a potential pathogen might travel.

Their findings, published Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, indicate that a sick neighbor is certainly something to worry about when flying. Those within a row of a sick person and within two seats to either side had an 80 percent chance of getting sick in their model, which used a fairly high assumed rate of transmission. The risk of infection drops off sharply after that, though. Those more than a few seats away had little to worry about. That’s even closer than the two row-minimum suggested by public health agencies.

A sick crew member, however, posed a little more danger. They move around the cabin more and have more contact with passengers, so the risk of transmission increases. Just one sick flight attendant infected almost five people on average in the researcher’s model. That’s a big number, but it does make some assumptions, the biggest of which is that sick crew members even come in to work. It’s more likely that they would just stay home.

Back Down to Earth

There are difficulties in modeling disease transmission rates on such a small scale like this, and this particular study wasn’t very big. They looked at just ten flights and the longest was only a bit over five hours. International flights can go for fifteen hours or longer, and involve much more movement on the part of passengers, something that could increase the risk of infection.

Their model also only looked at microbes that could be carried by droplets, which don’t travel very far. Viruses spread by smaller aerosol particles could circulate much longer and farther. This includes diseases like tuberculosis and measles. Air travel also involves extended periods of contact with other passengers at boarding gates, security checkpoints and elsewhere, and this could affect rates of transmission as well.

It’s also worth pointing out that we encounter similarly confined, crowded spaces during the course of our daily lives. Buses, movie theaters, workplaces and more pose the same sort of risks, though the authors don’t provide any measure of comparison here. Airplanes, do, however, travel long distances very quickly, something that can turn a local epidemic into a pandemic within days. That hasn’t happened yet, though scattered cases involving SARS and Ebola, among other diseases, have stoked worry.

Ultimately, a review of the scientific literature on the topic found moderate evidence that airplane cabins helped to spread influenza. This latest study doesn’t really change that, though it does reveal the danger that an infected crew member poses.

So, for flight attendants — and for all of us, really — if you’re sick, just stay home.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Health

Yet Another Study Says Vitamin Supplements Are Worthless

(Credit: Thunderstock/Shutterstock)

Vitamin — the first four letters come from the Latin word for “life.” To sustain that, we need these organic compounds in small amounts, but it seems their purpose ends there.

New research reaffirms the counterintuitive notion that vitamin and mineral supplements aren’t the magical panacea we’ve been led to believe. It’s something that researchers have been finding for years, and a meta-analysis, summarizing the findings of 179 individual studies, published on Monday in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology found that most common vitamins provide precisely zero benefit to those taking them.

Non-vital Vitamins

Specifically, the study concluded that multivitamins, as well as calcium, and vitamins C and D are essentially powerless. They do no harm, but they might as well be placebos. These findings run contrary to popular wisdom, which instructs us to load up on supplements to reduce the risk of heart disease, cancer and premature death.

This isn’t the first time science has refuted vitamin worship. In 2013 a series of studies in the Annals of Internal Medicine, collectively including hundreds of thousands of participants, concurred that vitamins do not lead to any boost in health. In fact, the studies found that beta-carotene, vitamin E and possibly high doses of vitamin A actually slightly increase mortality.

The only supplement that may live up to its reputation, according to the new study, is folic acid. This, with or without vitamin B, may prevent cardiovascular disease and stroke.

The tradition of using vitamins and minerals for nutrient deficiencies dates back to 1747, when the British naval surgeon James Lind treated scurvy with citrus fruit, rich in vitamin C. Physicians routinely make such prescriptions, though usually only in cases where the patient has a demonstrated deficiency of a particular vitamin or nutrient.

Supplement Crazy

In recent years, though, we’ve come to view supplements as the gateway to general health and longevity. A Gallup poll in 2013 showed that 50 percent of Americans regularly take vitamins or multivitamins.

On the flip side, a comparison of Gallup polls in 1975 and 2016 reveals plunging public trust in the mainstream American medical system. This phenomenon may have contributed to the ascent of “natural” vitamin and mineral supplements.

But it probably also stems from rampant marketing and advertising. Thanks to the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994, manufacturers don’t have to prove the to the Food and Drug Administration that their supplements work. They can claim their products work, though, as long as they keep it vague (“strengthens the body”) and don’t profess to truly treat anything.

Call it a healthcare failure, call it a marketing miracle. Either way, call a doctor before you pop another vitamin. Odds are they’ll tell you to stick to fruits and veggies.

Continue Reading

Health

KNOW THE CAUSE: Lyme Disease and Fungus

Lyme Disease and Fungus

Facebook ➥ http://9nl.co/amk9
Twitter ➥ http://9nl.co/dzja
Instagram ➥ http://9nl.co/tx4h
Pinterest ➥ http://9nl.co/4tg2

Host:
Doug Kaufmann

Guests:
Ross Pelton, RPH, PHD, CCN
Dr. Greg Emerson
Lindsey Crouch

Topics:
Dr Emerson Discusses Obesity
Probiotics That Produce Glutathione
The Vitamin You Don’t Need To Swallow
Lyme Disease and Fungus
Only Buy These If Organically Produced

Supplements:
Dr Ohirra’s Probiotics
Regactiv

Contact information:
EFI – Dr Ohirra’s Probiotics
www.HealthWorksProbiotics.com
877-673-2536

☑ Start the Phase One Diet ➥ http://9nl.co/bcqf
☑ Watch Today’s Episodes ➥ http://9nl.co/b1qo
☑ Who is Doug Kaufmann? ➥ http://9nl.co/wvdd
☑ Visit our Bookstore ➥ http://9nl.co/2dys

Continue Reading

Health

Morgellons and Dope (Crack)

Even though this person in this video blog needs help with her drug addiction she shares her true story of being infected with morgellons. Everyone has their own way in dealing with this horrible disease. If you google Morgellons or resistant scabies mites you will come across forums of people questioning if some narcotic drugs could possibly get rid of these things. It’s not uncommon to hear individuals who gets high and complains about feeling bugs crawling all over them, biting them, etc. In reality in many cases it is true. Because of these narcotic drugs poisoning the system it drives them out of the body. Just as the same as if taking anti-parasitic drugs such as ivermectin.

Morgellons disease is a poorly understood condition characterized by small fibers, particles and bugs emerging from the skin. People with this condition often report feeling as if something is crawling on or stinging/ biting their skin.

In no way do we endorse or suggest in using any illegal substance to deal or attempt to get rid of morgellons or resistant scabies mites.

 

 

Continue Reading

#Parasites

#SwimmersItch is a rash usually caused by an allergic reaction to #parasites that burrow into your skin while you're swimming or wading in warm water. These tips may reduce the itch: mayocl.in/2t7dkHn. #HomeRemedies

test Twitter Media - #SwimmersItch is a rash usually caused by an allergic reaction to #parasites that burrow into your skin while you're swimming or wading in warm water. These tips may reduce the itch: https://t.co/YImO6yV3ZY. #HomeRemedies https://t.co/kYa9awHWUd

#Ivermectin

"The pharmaceutical giant @Merck, which makes #Mectizan, the brand-name version of #ivermectin"🇨🇦 What I'm thinking is, can these drugs be helpful with #LymeDisease from #tics, or any other wee beastie attached to humans, resistant #lice, maybe🧐🤔🔬#StudyIt #Hmmm

"#Merck, which makes #Mectizan, the brand-name version of #ivermectin" So I just came across this VERY interesting information I'd never heard of, before, I didn't know that life-saving & significant healing #drugs are blocked by companies if there isn't enough #profit🤨🤔🧐

#Hmm #medicine #WhoKnew? The pharmaceutical giant Merck, which makes Mectizan, the brand-name version of #ivermectin Why world-beating tropical drugs are so hard to get in Canada /via @globeandmail theglobeandmail.com/news/national/…

outbreaknewstoday.com/river-blindnes… #onchocerciasis @US_FDA approval of #moxidectin was based on data from 2 randomized, double blind, active controlled clinical studies. Each study showed statistically significant superiority of moxidectin over current standard of care #ivermectin @TDRnews

Trending